LF logo
by learnformula
search
Log in
search
Courses/Law/Intellectual Property Law

Section 56(5) Trademarks Act: First Judicial Guidance

A practical analysis of Products Unlimited v Five Seasons and the new leave requirement under the Trademarks Act

Created byLorraine M. Fleck
BeginnerUpdated Apr 1, 2026
Section 56(5) Trademarks Act: First Judicial Guidance

What You'll Learn

check_circleUnderstand the new statutory framework governing additional evidence on trademark appeals.
check_circleApply the Federal Court’s four-factor approach to leave under subsection 56(5).
check_circleAssess how delay, confidentiality concerns, and procedural history affect leave applications.
check_circleEvaluate how materiality now influences both leave and standard of review.
check_circleAdjust appeal strategy in light of potential standalone motions for leave.
check_circleIdentify practical risks and opportunities arising from the amended regime.

About This Course

The Federal Court’s decision in Products Unlimited, Inc v Five Seasons Comfort Limited, 2026 FC 48 marks the first judicial consideration of the new leave requirement under subsection 56(5) of the Trademarks Act.

Since April 2025, parties appealing decisions of the Registrar of Trademarks can no longer rely on additional evidence as of right. Instead, leave of the Court is now required — a procedural shift with significant strategic implications for trademark oppositions and appeals.

This session examines the Court’s guidance on when leave will be granted, how materiality now intersects with the standard of review, and what practitioners should consider when deciding whether, when, and how to seek to adduce additional evidence on appeal. The webinar also explores how transitional considerations may affect cases straddling the April 2025 amendments.

What You Will Learn

By the end of this course, participants will be able to:

  • Deconstruct the Statutory Framework: Understand the historical context, legislative intent, and previous ambiguities surrounding Section 56(5) of the Trademarks Act.
  • Analyze the Landmark Case: Take a deep dive into the facts, arguments, and final judicial reasoning of the breakthrough case that established this new precedent.
  • Assess Practical Implications: Evaluate how this ruling alters trademark prosecution, opposition proceedings, and infringement litigation moving forward.
  • Update Client Strategies: Formulate new, legally sound strategies for advising corporate clients, managing risk, and protecting well-known marks under the updated legal framework.
  • Anticipate Future Developments: Explore how lower courts and IP offices are likely to apply this guidance in upcoming disputes.

Who Should Attend?

  • Intellectual Property (IP) Lawyers and Litigators
  • Registered Trademark Agents and Attorneys
  • In-House Corporate Counsel
  • Legal Academics and IP Law Students
  • Brand Managers and IP Portfolio Strategists

Your Instructor

Lorraine M. Fleck
Lorraine M. Fleck

Principal, Lawyer & Trademark Agent

menu_book1 courses

Lorraine Fleck is an experienced Ontario-licensed lawyer and Canadian trademark agent who takes a realistic, commercially driven approach to helping clients proactively identify and manage risk while supporting growth and profitability. She provides strategic legal advice on advertising and marketing, commercial contracts, intellectual property (IP), and information technology (IT), including artificial intelligence (AI) risk management, as well as procurement, privacy, anti-spam compliance, and related regulatory matters. Lorraine has been repeatedly recommended by World Trademark Review magazine for eight consecutive years as a leading Canadian expert in trademark litigation, enforcement, prosecution, and strategy. She is also recognized by her peers in Best Lawyers® in Canada for her expertise in advertising, IP, IT, and technology law. Lorraine’s experience includes serving as Senior Legal Counsel at a private-equity-owned consumer packaged goods manufacturer with global operations. In that role, she managed international IP portfolios and licensing, led IP change management initiatives, and provided legal guidance on advertising, anti-bribery and anti-corruption compliance, commercial contracts, IT matters, mergers and acquisitions, privacy, product recalls, supply chain issues, and other regulatory matters. Earlier in her career, she was a founding partner and principal of two Toronto-based IP boutique law firms, both of which were recognized among Canadian Lawyer magazine’s Top 10 IP boutiques in Canada. She is active in both the Canadian and international legal communities and leverages those connections and insights to help clients manage their businesses proactively, minimize risk, and maximize profitability. Lorraine is the past Chair of the North American Subcommittee of the International Trademark Association’s Brand Restrictions Committee, where she advocated against trademark use restrictions in advertising across multiple industries. Such restrictions can reduce consumer choice and competition, facilitate counterfeiting linked to organized crime, contribute to supply shortages affecting vulnerable populations, reduce employment tied to branded products, and discourage investment in intellectual property. Her prior leadership roles also include Chair of the Ontario Bar Association’s IT & IP Section Executive and service on the Licensing Executives Society (LES) Toronto Chapter Executive in several roles, including Chapter Chair. She has authored numerous legal publications and serves as General Editor of LexisNexis Canada’s Internet and Technology Law in Canada newsletter. Lorraine is also a frequent speaker on issues related to her practice areas and has been interviewed by Canadian media on intellectual property topics.

Credit Information

What Students Are Saying

0.0
Student's Choice
0 reviews

Frequently Asked Questions

We are a registered provider with 327+ associations and regulatory bodies worldwide. We operate across 29 global markets including Canada, the US, Australia, and the UK. Every course page clearly displays its specific accreditations. Upon completion, you receive a professional certificate that can be validated online. Our certificates include all necessary accreditation details, credit hours, and completion dates, and are formatted specifically to meet the submission requirements of most global regulatory bodies.